#Epson perfection 4870 serial
MAKE CERTAIN THAT THE SOURCE VOLTAGES IS THE SAME AS THE RATED VOLTAGE, LISTED ON THE SERIAL NPRODUCT HAS A PRIMARY AC RATING DIFFERENT FROM AVAILABLE POWER SOURCE, DO NOT CONNECT IT TO TĪLWAYS VERIFY THAT THE EPSON PRODUCT HAS BEEN DISCONNECTED FROM THE POWER SOURCE BEFORE RBOARDS AND/OR INDIVIDUAL CHIPS. REPAIRS ON EPSON PRODUCT SHOULD BE PERFORMED ONLY BY AN EPSON CERTIFIED RE
![epson perfection 4870 epson perfection 4870](https://i5.walmartimages.com/asr/6912e693-c87c-4911-bec5-9de6ff423ea3_1.39fb7e8f4b18c6dd2fcf92c42b8eeb35.jpeg)
WHEN DISASSEMBLING OR ASSEMBLING A PRODUCT, MAKE SURE TO WEAR GLOVES TO AVOID INJURIER FROM WHEN PERFORMING TESTING AS DICTATED WITHIN THIS MANUAL, DO NOT CONNECT THE UNIT TO A POWER SOTHE POWER SUPPLY CABLE MUST BE CONNECTED, USE EXTREME CAUTION IN WORKING ON POWER SUPPLY A NO WORK SHOULD BE PERFORMED ON THE UNIT BY PERSONS UNFAMILIAR WITH BASIC SAFETY MEASURES ASTECHNICIANS IN THEIR LINE OF WORK. Great caution shouldDANGER Headings.ĪRNING Signals a precaution which, if ignored, could result in damage to equipment.Į precautionary measures itemized below should always be observed when performing repair/maintenance procedures.ĪLWAYS DISCONNECT THE PRODUCT FROM THE POWER SOURCE AND PERIPHERAL DEVICES PERFORMING AN NGER Signals a precaution which, if ignored, could result in serious or fatal personal injury. IF SECOND SOURCE IC OR SON PRODUCT, OR COULD VOID THE PRECAUTIONSecautionary notations throughout the text are categorized relative to 1) Personal injury and 2) damage to equipment. I & I CS Quality Promotion DepartmentĭA be exercised in performing procedures preceded byģ. EPSON disclaims any and all rights in those marks. SON is a registered trademark of SEIKO EPSON CORPORATION.Įneral Notice: Other product names used herein are for identification purpose only and may be traderespective owners. The above not withstanding SEIKO EPSON CORPORATION can assume no responsibility for any errors in this
#Epson perfection 4870 manual
The contents of this manual are subject to change without notice.
![epson perfection 4870 epson perfection 4870](https://sc02.alicdn.com/kf/UTB8YhfdsGrFXKJk43Ovq6ybnpXaD.jpg)
However, should any errors be appreciate being informed of them. No part of this manual may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any photocopying, or otherwise, without the prior written permission of SEIKO EPSON CORPORATION.Īll effort have been made to ensure the accuracy of the contents of this manual. G marks or registered trademarks of theirĬo NoticeAll rights reserved. Thus I now cut my rolls into halves of 2 frames each so I can orient the strip in a way, that the iamge is always being scanned in window #2.Form or by any means electronic, mechanical, I also found that for whatever reason, window #2 gives much better results than window #1 (out of the 4 frames a strip of 6圆 120 roll film contains). Fortunately I can switch focus off in SilverFast. The autofocus of the MicroTek is not precise enough for my scans. A glass negative carrier is a MUST (with all the consequences of dust removal (I use antistatic bruch and air). So before you decide for the Epson, do some soul searching about what you like to achieve! The Epsons certainly are good, but they are by no means all you can get from your MF slides!Īs an additional note: I find the MicroTek quite tricky to use for optimal results. When I apply auto sharpening, the scans look ridiculously (and unnaturally) sharp actually. With the MicroTek I can truly scan to grain level (Fuji Velvia and Fuji Reala films) without using any sharpening whatsoever. These are very soft!With USM you can make every scan look so much better (and that's why I thought previously very highly of the Epson). Take a close look at the sample scans they post, which had no USM applied. These scans look VERY soft to me, when unprocessed.
![epson perfection 4870 epson perfection 4870](https://media.kieskeurig.nl/images/00/92/61/63/12fd/4aa9/b38b/a4333e321f7b/400x400.jpg)
I looked at the review on the UK website mentioned above. This is severe!!! In retrospect, I wish I would have done it right the first time!
![epson perfection 4870 epson perfection 4870](https://d38d6e358n4j8o.cloudfront.net/user_images2/1362_3489767.jpg)
Thus I find myself in the situation to rescan everything I did 2 years ago (a waste of 200-300 hours perhaps).
#Epson perfection 4870 full
Scanning is VERY time consuming, expect at least 20-30 minuted for each scan (including setup time and processing), and it can easily go to a full hour if you have to do lots of dust removal. I now find a VERY SIGNIFICANT improvement in my scans. Well, 2 years have passed and I bought a MicroTek 120TF scanner for $1500, which probably is as good as the Nikon. I like to warn you about a mistake I made: I had the Epson 2450 a few years ago, and felt very happy about the scans I was getting from my medium format slides (I even had one slide compared against the Nikon 8000 and at that time did not find the difference enough to justify the 10x price difference - the Nikon8000 did cost $3000 at that time).